Market Share

Bitcoin Mining Pool Distribution

→
Pool Deep Dive
Total Blocks
-
-
Active Pools
-
unique miners
Total Fees
-BTC
collected in period
Avg Fee/Block
-BTC
per block
Zero-Fee Blocks
-
-
Nakamoto Coeff
-
pools for 51%
MARKET SHARE DISTRIBUTION
Pool Market Share
Loading data
Blocks by Pool (Top 10)
Loading data
Daily Pool Distribution (%) Percentage of blocks mined by each pool per day
Loading data
NETWORK DECENTRALIZATION
HHI Index i Herfindahl-Hirschman Index

Measures market concentration on a scale of 0-10,000.

0-1,500: Competitive market
1,500-2,500: Moderate concentration
2,500+: High concentration

Lower values indicate more decentralization.
-
-
Top 3 Pools
-
share of hashrate
Top 5 Pools
-
share of hashrate
Nakamoto Coeff i Nakamoto Coefficient

The minimum number of entities (pools) required to collude to control 51% of the network hashrate.

Higher = Better
More entities needed = More decentralized

Named after Satoshi Nakamoto.
-
min pools for 51%
HASHRATE DISTRIBUTION
Estimated Hashrate by Pool Based on blocks mined per day
Loading data
FEE ANALYSIS
Total Fees by Pool
Loading data
Average Fee per Block
Loading data
Zero-Fee/Empty Blocks by Pool
Pool Zero-Fee Blocks Total Blocks Percentage
MARKET SHARE CHANGES
📈 Top Gainers
📉 Top Losers
Market Share Changes (All Pools)
Pool Current Share Previous Share Change
CONSECUTIVE BLOCKS
Longest Consecutive Runs (by Pool)
Loading data
Recent Long Consecutive Runs
Pool Blocks Start Height Date
POOL LUCK OVERVIEW
Pool Luck Summary
Pool Blocks Expected Luck %
Pool Variance Statistics
Pool Variance Std Dev Actual−Expected
HASHRATE vs LUCK CORRELATION
Pool Dominance vs Luck Variance i Dominance-Luck Correlation

Shows how pool size affects luck stability:

X-axis: Pool's hashrate share (%)
Y-axis: Luck standard deviation
Bubble size: Number of blocks

Larger pools have more stable luck (lower variance) due to statistical law of large numbers. Bubble size = total blocks · Hover for details
Loading data
NETWORK DECENTRALIZATION OVER TIME
Nakamoto Coefficient Over Time i Nakamoto Coefficient

The minimum number of entities (pools) that would need to collude to control 51% of the network hashrate.

Higher = Better - More entities needed means more decentralization

Uses a rolling 30-day window for calculation. Minimum pools needed for 51% control · 30-day rolling window
Loading data
Nakamoto Coefficient Stats
Current
-
Period Min
-
Period Max
-
Period Avg
-
NHI (Network Health Index) Stats
Current
-
Period Min
-
Period Max
-
Period Avg
-
Network Health Index (NHI) Over Time i Network Health Index

Composite index measuring overall network health considering:

• Nakamoto Coefficient (51% threshold)
• HHI (market concentration)
• Active pool count

Higher = Healthier

Uses a rolling 30-day window for calculation. Composite health score · 30-day rolling window
Loading data
ADVANCED CONCENTRATION ANALYTICS
Top Pool Share Over Time Largest pool's hashrate share · 30-day rolling
Loading data
Top 3 Pools Share Over Time Combined share of 3 largest pools
Loading data
HHI Index Over Time i Herfindahl-Hirschman Index

Market concentration metric (0-10,000):

0-1,500: Competitive
1,500-2,500: Moderate
2,500+: Concentrated

Lower = More decentralized Market concentration · Lower is better
Loading data
Unknown Miners Share Unidentified pool signatures over time
Loading data
📊 Hashrate-Luck Correlation Insights
Share vs Luck StdDev
-
correlation coefficient
Share vs Luck CV
-
correlation coefficient
Interpretation
-